AN ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS’ SPEAKING ABILITY OF PROCEDURE TEXT AT GRADE X OF SMK NEGERI 1 AIR JOMAN IN ACADEMIC YEAR OF 2020/2021
Abstract
ABSTRACT
This research purposed to measure the students’ ability procedure text in speaking
procedure text. The location of this research was SMK 1 Airjoman. The time that was
alocated in this research was one month. This research was conducted in descriptive
quantitative. The method in taking the sample was random sampling. The population of
this research was all of grade X students that consisted of two classes. Each class was
consisted of 39 students for 1 class and 30 students for one class with the total population
was 80 students. Because of this research was using descriptive quantitative, the researcher
choose X TPL and XTKR with 20 students as the sample of the research. The instruments that
used in this research was a test. The test was a multiple choice test. The test was asking
the students to rearrange the procedure text to a good text. Based on the result of the
research, the students’ ability in speaking procedure text was low. It was proved by their
mean score in speaking procedure text that only reach 59.0. This indicated that the
calculated value of r is greater than the critical value at the level 5% = 0.312 and at levell
1% = 0.403. [0.81>0.312]. It can be conluded that there is any significant an analysis of
students speaking ability of procedure text significantly. From this research, there are three
instruments in examining their ability including pronunciation, fluency, and intonation.
Pronunciation and Intonation were the most troublesome for the students because the
students mostly made mistakes in that parts. It is hoped that by the finding of these trouble,
there will be future research on this subject so that there will be some method or strategy
that enable to overcome these troubles.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
REFERENCES
Arikunto, S. 2006. Dasar-dasar Evaluasi
Penilitian PendidikanJakarta: Bumi
Aksara.
Arikunto, S. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian,
Suatu Pendekatan Praktek.Jakarta:
Rineka Cipta.
Belmont and Sharkey. 2011. The Easy
Writer: Formal Writing for Academic
Purposes, 3rdEdition. Australia.
Brown, D.H. 1980. Principles of Language
Learning and Teaching. UnitedStates
of America.
Brucem, I. 2008. Academic Writing and
Genre. New York.
Chandler, D. 2000. An Introduction to
Genre Theory. Australia.
Devitt, A. 2004.Writing Genres. Southern
Illinois University.
Elder, S. 2009. ILO school to work
transition survey: A methodological
guide.
International Labour Organization.
Handcock and Gile. August 2011. On the
Concept of Snowball
Sampling.England.
Khansir, A.A. May 2012. Error Analysis
and Second Language Acquisition.
Finland. Knapp and Watkins. 2005. Genre,
Text, Grammar. Australia: University
of
New South Wales.
Llach, A.P.M. 2011.Lexical Errors and
Accuracy in Foreign Language
Writing. Ireland: Trinity College.
Mertens, N. 2010.Writing: Processes,
Tools, and Techniques. New York:
Nova Science Publishe
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36294/pionir.v7i2.2334
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Ciptaan disebarluaskan di bawah Lisensi Creative Commons Atribusi 4.0 Internasional.