THE EFFECTIVENESS OF IMAGINATIVE READING MATERIALS IN STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION TEXT OF THE GRADE XI STUDENTS AT SMA SWASTA MUHAMMADIYAH -8 KISARAN IN SCHOOL YEAR 2015 / 2016

Rahma Yunita Ansi

Abstract


ABSTRACT

 

This research was carried out to find the effective of using imaginative reading materials on students reading comprehension. The population of the study was 2015 /2016 second year students of SMA Swasta Muhammadiyah-8 Kisaran. The number of population of this research consisted of three parallel classes, which were selected by using cluster random sampling technique, the total were (80) students. The sample was divide into two groups; the first group is (40) students (XI IPS 1) which was the Experimental group and the second group is (40) students (XI IPS 2) which was the Control group. The experimental group was taught by using imaginative reading materials while the control group was taught without using imaginative reading materials. The instrument of the research was test. There were two kinds of test that the researcher used, they were pre-test and post-test. These tests were used to know the students’ reading comprehension before and after they are taught using imaginative reading materials. After the data had been collected, they were analyzed by using t-test formula in order to see whether the imaginative reading materials significantly affect students’ reading comprehension. The result of the analysis showed that the t-observed (5,55), it was higher than the t-table (1,852) with the level of significant (0.05) and the degree of freedom (df) (78).  So the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is accepted and null hypothesis (Ho) is rejected. It was concluded that imaginative reading materials significantly affects students’ reading comprehension.  

Key words: imaginative reading materials, reading comprehension


Full Text:

PDF

References


REFERENCES

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2006. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta

Balton Smith, Nila and Robinson. 1980. Reading for a Instruction for today’s children edition. New York: Eaglewood Cliffs Prentice Hall Inc

Brown, H.D. 2003. Teaching by Principles an Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. Engelwood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents

Burns, P.C., Betty, D., Roe and Eliot, P.R. 2000. Teaching reading in today’s Elementary school. Boston: Hongton Miffin Company

Carrel, Patricia. L. 1988. Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading. Cambridge University Press

Grabe and Fredicka L. Stoller, William.2002. Teaching and Researching Reading. Britain: Pearson Education

Harmer, J. 2001. How to Teach English. New York: Logman

Janette K. Klinger, Sharon Vaugh, and Alison Boardman. 2007. Teaching Reading Comprehension to Students with Learning Difficulties, New York: The Guilford Press

Richards & Theodore S. Rodger, Jack C. 2001. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. United States of America: Cambridge University Press

Sugiyono, 2008. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfa Beta

Webster, Noah. 1980. Webster’s 20th Century Dictionary of the English Language. US: William Collins Publisher

Wilhelm, J. 2004 Reading Is Seeing. Scholastic, New York: Doug Buehl

http://www.edudemic.com/8-types-of-imagination/ accessed on November 29th2013


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.